I have recently been dialoguing with a new full preterist friend, Patrick Stone, about the timing of the millennium. Early on in the conversation, the possibility was raised that the First Resurrection of Rev 20.4-6 occurred at the beginning of the Roman-Jewish war and corresponds to the resurrection of the martyrs at the time the fifth seal is broken (Rev 6.9-11). Patrick has been exploring the viability of this interpretation, and has come out in the affirmative with this extensive article. As a bonus, his interpretation makes some very interesting suggestions about the nature of the Resurrection.

In this article, Patrick utilizes a hermeneutic for reading the recurring symbology of Revelation that I find to be quite plausible for a conscious first-century author: it has the virtues of not viewing Revelation as either a reckless jumble of imagery or a composition of wholly ecstatic origin, decipherable only with an esoteric “key” (usually some ad hoc rubric favorable only to a predetermined interpretation). Of course, one of the biggest problems with interpreting Revelation is its undeniably cryptic usage of numbers, which for futurists has strangely not called into question the idea that the “millennium” must require a time period that at least resembles 1,000 years. Patrick gives a novel but quite simple numerical interpretation that makes some sense of the millennium in relation to other time periods mentioned in Revelation.

This is a large article, and I haven’t read it all the way through yet. Check it out, and let me know what you think!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • PrintFriendly
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. The reign of Christ during the Millennium As my regulars probably know, I like podcasts. One I listen to regularly (it comes out daily) is Renewing Your Mind with Dr. R.C. Sproul...
  2. The Millennium and the Resurrection of the Dead I am firmly indebted to Don Preston for his presentation on the Millennium at the 2004 Preterist Research Institute Conference for much of the layout...
  • Patrick Stone
    The most interesting thing regarding the hermeneutic is that after applying it consistently to all the visions in Revelation, the resulting chronology best fits the "Full Preterist" interpetation.

    For example, The battle of Gog and Magog = The Battle of Armageddon; The Millennium = The second period of 3 1/2 years (ie: the millennium is complete); etc...


    What is important though, is that unlike previous hermeneutics where the order of the visions is influenced by the view itself (e.g.: preterists presupposing the visions parallel the Roman-Jewish war), this hermeneutic is INDEPENDENT of any view (full preterist, partial preterist, historicist, futurist) and essentially lets the chips fall where they lie.
  • Great - although I really can imagine that this has been theorized by a number of expositors throughout history. You'd really be hard-pressed to get me to entertain the thought that the white robes weren't in some way pictures of resurrection bodies considering all the passages mentioned by Mounce.

    This definitely underscores an individual aspect to the Resurrection, although it doesn't really jeopardize the corporate aspect either.
  • Patrick Stone
    Robert Henry Charles (1920, Futurist)

    http://tinyurl.com/5je5aw
  • Patrick Stone
    Found this googling... (google books)

    The Book of Revelation by Robert Mounce, p70
    FN 27. "Charles writes that the white garments are 'the spiritural bodies in which the faithful are to be clothed in the resurrection life' (1.82) He finds the idea expressed in Matt 13:43, 2 Cor 5:1, 4; Phil 3:21; Asc. Isa 4:16; 2 Enoch 22:8; and elsewhere (cf 1.82-83)."

    not sure who Charles is though...
blog comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe without commenting