Archives for “Peter Enns”

Not that I have all the answers, of course. I thought I’d reproduce a summary of my current thoughts on the issue that I formulated in an interesting comment exchange under a post on another site. I asked what sort of question the authors of Genesis 1 etiology intended to answer: [1] why the world exists, [2] how it got made, or [3] both. One commenter (whose [...] Related posts:

  1. Chaos in Genesis and Germanic mythology
  2. N.T. Wright on “unfaithful”, “flat” readings of Genesis
  3. Explaining Genesis to our children


Dr. Enns has recently reminded us that the Ancient Near East conceptualized the beginning of creation as a battle between order and disorder, the gods vs. chaos. We see the chaos of the natural world represented as an antagonist in the Genesis cosmogony. The forces of chaos are never quite given the dignity of a [...] Related posts:

  1. Why Genesis 1 was written
  2. N.T. Wright on “unfaithful”, “flat” readings of Genesis
  3. Contextual interpretation in Genesis: Cain’s mark


All Christians generally agree that the Bible was written down by humans, and most agree that in some way their writings are reflective of their individuality; the question comes in with the nature of divine influence.  Where do we draw the line between the human and the divine in Scripture? Proponents of inerrancy posit that all information [...] Related posts:

  1. The Bible made flesh
  2. Human interpretations of Scripture and nature
  3. The authority of Scripture


I have read summaries of the incarnational model of Scripture as developed by Peter Enns, late of Westminster Theological Seminary, but too little of Enns himself. I think this recent post clarifying his model is quite useful. The incarnation is essentially and inextricably a divine/human phenomenon. This means that, in speaking of the nature [...] Related posts:

  1. Thinking “Outside the Box” about the Bible
  2. Finding God’s hand in Scripture
  3. The Bible and the need for proof