<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search and rescue &#8211; or invasion and annexation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://undeception.com/search-and-rescueor-invasion-and-annexation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://undeception.com/search-and-rescueor-invasion-and-annexation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=search-and-rescueor-invasion-and-annexation</link>
	<description>Faith, mutatis mutandis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 22:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://undeception.com/search-and-rescueor-invasion-and-annexation/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undeception.com/?p=29#comment-71</guid>
		<description>My favorite is, &quot;You ain&#039;t preachin&#039;!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite is, &#8220;You ain&#8217;t preachin&#8217;!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://undeception.com/search-and-rescueor-invasion-and-annexation/#comment-91362</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undeception.com/?p=29#comment-91362</guid>
		<description>My favorite is, &quot;You ain&#039;t preachin&#039;!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite is, &#8220;You ain&#8217;t preachin&#8217;!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://undeception.com/search-and-rescueor-invasion-and-annexation/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undeception.com/?p=29#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Preach it! Or as one of the ladies at TD this past weekend was fond of saying, &quot;Tell it!&quot; I like that, however country it sounds--kinda gets at the whole &quot;proclaim&quot; thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preach it! Or as one of the ladies at TD this past weekend was fond of saying, &#8220;Tell it!&#8221; I like that, however country it sounds&#8211;kinda gets at the whole &#8220;proclaim&#8221; thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://undeception.com/search-and-rescueor-invasion-and-annexation/#comment-91363</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undeception.com/?p=29#comment-91363</guid>
		<description>Preach it! Or as one of the ladies at TD this past weekend was fond of saying, &quot;Tell it!&quot; I like that, however country it sounds--kinda gets at the whole &quot;proclaim&quot; thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preach it! Or as one of the ladies at TD this past weekend was fond of saying, &#8220;Tell it!&#8221; I like that, however country it sounds&#8211;kinda gets at the whole &#8220;proclaim&#8221; thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://undeception.com/search-and-rescueor-invasion-and-annexation/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undeception.com/?p=29#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Well see, that&#039;s it, isn&#039;t it?  I, too, have had major theological presumptions demolished, which has led me to think twice before automatically disregarding a new point of view, especially when the only reason I would reject it out of hand is that &quot;I like my belief just fine, thank you very much&quot;.  As convinced as I am, I am ready and willing to reject preterism, as soon as someone shows me real weaknesses in my position and the same number of strengths and consistency in another position -- but that hasn&#039;t happened yet.

I can tell you for sure, I&#039;ve been there and examined premillennial futurism, and it just doesn&#039;t cut it.  Postmillennialism is better, but only of the preteristic type (i.e. it acknowledges a first-century commencement of the millennium).

Thanks for the response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well see, that&#8217;s it, isn&#8217;t it?  I, too, have had major theological presumptions demolished, which has led me to think twice before automatically disregarding a new point of view, especially when the only reason I would reject it out of hand is that &#8220;I like my belief just fine, thank you very much&#8221;.  As convinced as I am, I am ready and willing to reject preterism, as soon as someone shows me real weaknesses in my position and the same number of strengths and consistency in another position &#8212; but that hasn&#8217;t happened yet.</p>
<p>I can tell you for sure, I&#8217;ve been there and examined premillennial futurism, and it just doesn&#8217;t cut it.  Postmillennialism is better, but only of the preteristic type (i.e. it acknowledges a first-century commencement of the millennium).</p>
<p>Thanks for the response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

